RE: RE: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System(DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible ProvisioningProtocol

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF070312DA40@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
True, but it doesn't take much work to find out that there is work in
progress.  New draft announcements are part of the process.  There are
also multiple links to both current and old work on the IETF web site
for anyone who takes the time to look:
 
Concluded working groups:
http://www.ietf.org/wg/concluded/
 
Working group mailing lists:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/list/wg/
 
Even a google search on "Extensible Provisioning Protocol" will turn up
links to new work done since the working group closed.
 
Scott


________________________________

	From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] 
	Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 7:53 AM
	To: Hollenbeck, Scott
	Cc: Alexey Melnikov; EPP Provreg
	Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] RE: Last Call:
draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System(DNS) Security Extensions
Mapping for the Extensible ProvisioningProtocol
	
	
	 
	> All individual submission work that happened after the group
closed was
	> done in complete accordance with IETF procedures, with
appropriate
	> public announcements, using the agreed-upon mailing list.
Responsible
	> "stakeholders" have a responsibility to stay involved, Bernie.

	
	New stakeholders also have to find out how to _get_ involved. 
	
	As a relative newbie to the IETF world (and only being employed
in the registry business since late 2007) I only found out about this
group by accident when I spotted the earlier EPPbis documents in the
"new drafts" RSS feed. 
	
	kind regards, 
	
	Ray
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.