Re: RFC4310bis document writeup
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF243C1A54.4DCC81EB-ON802576DC.00311330-802576DC.00323207@nominet.org.uk> |
> Version 07 a nits pass Olafur, There's actually some substantial new text in §4 introduced between the -06 and the -07 versions to address my comments about <secdns:dsData> vs <secdns:keyData>. In particular the newly documented requirement that EPP clients have to "remove all" and then re-insert DNSSEC data in order to migrate from one format to the other on a _per_domain_ basis may have significant design and implementation overhead that was not previously anticipated. I'm still trying to grok the implications of this new text, and am consulting with our EPP implementors as to whether this is considered too arduous a requirement to be written in stone in the draft. kind regards, Ray -- Ray Bellis, MA(Oxon) MIET Senior Researcher in Advanced Projects, Nominet e: [email protected], t: +44 1865 332211