Re: RFC4310bis document writeup

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <OF243C1A54.4DCC81EB-ON802576DC.00311330-802576DC.00323207@nominet.org.uk>
> Version 07 a nits pass

Olafur,

There's actually some substantial new text in §4 introduced between the 
-06 and the -07  versions to address my comments about <secdns:dsData> vs 
<secdns:keyData>.

In particular the newly documented requirement that EPP clients have to 
"remove all" and then re-insert DNSSEC data in order to migrate from one 
format to the other on a _per_domain_ basis may have significant design 
and implementation overhead that was not previously anticipated.

I'm still trying to grok the implications of this new text, and am 
consulting with our EPP implementors as to whether this is considered too 
arduous a requirement to be written in stone in the draft.

kind regards,

Ray

-- 
Ray Bellis, MA(Oxon) MIET
Senior Researcher in Advanced Projects, Nominet
e: [email protected], t: +44 1865 332211
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.