Re: lp:trademark_name field
Gavin Brown <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Volker, thanks for your feedback. > I had a look at the draft and thought about some experiences we had with > launch phases. A question regarding the lp:trademark_name field appeared. My understanding of this field is that it does not contain data that is used to validate the applicant's eligibility. When a trademark clearinghouse is validating an application (for example.foo, say), they will take the trademark number (provided in the <lp:trademark_number> element) and use this to obtain the full trademark information from the trademark authority that has jurisdiction over the locality specified in the <lp:trademark_locality> element. This information will include the trademark name. The clearinghouse will then apply whatever the TLD's policy is for confirming that the trademark matches the domain name being applied for. The <lp:trademark_name> field is therefore only a hint used to confirm the mark to which the application refers, but doesn't uniquely and solely identify it. It may not even be needed. Does anyone agree/disagree? G. -- CentralNic Ltd Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry Services for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries https://www.centralnic.com/ CentralNic Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 4985780. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6AR. _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg