Re: lp:trademark_name field

Gavin Brown <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Volker, thanks for your feedback.

> I had a look at the draft and thought about some experiences we had with
> launch phases. A question regarding the lp:trademark_name field appeared.

My understanding of this field is that it does not contain data that is 
used to validate the applicant's eligibility.

When a trademark clearinghouse is validating an application (for 
example.foo, say), they will take the trademark number (provided in the 
<lp:trademark_number> element) and use this to obtain the full trademark 
information from the trademark authority that has jurisdiction over the 
locality specified in the <lp:trademark_locality> element. This 
information will include the trademark name. The clearinghouse will then 
apply whatever the TLD's policy is for confirming that the trademark 
matches the domain name being applied for.

The <lp:trademark_name> field is therefore only a hint used to confirm 
the mark to which the application refers, but doesn't uniquely and 
solely identify it. It may not even be needed.

Does anyone agree/disagree?

G.

-- 
CentralNic Ltd
Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry Services
for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries
https://www.centralnic.com/

CentralNic Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company
number 4985780. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6AR.
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.