Re: lp:trademark_name field

Jens Wagner <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Organization HEXONET GmbH
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Gavin, Volker,

I think that a trademark_name field might be required, as long as 
there's no way to query the trademark_name from (trademark_number, 
trademark_locality) in realtime, for all permitted localities.

Reason is that a registry should immediately refuse a domain 
application, if the respective trademark_name does not cover the domain 
name that's applied for.

A registry making use of the launchphase extension should publish the 
set of allowed charactes for trademark_name, and should define a 
function which validates if a trademark_name covers a domain name (e.g. 
a german umlaut Ö could cover Ö only, or Ö, O and OE).

I would not a flag like "type='loc/int'" for this purpose, as it only 
says 'unicode' vs. 7-bit ASCII. Some registries might e.g. want to limit 
e.g. to cyrillic chars only.

Best,
-jens


Gavin Brown schrieb:
> Hi Volker, thanks for your feedback.
>
>> I had a look at the draft and thought about some experiences we had with
>> launch phases. A question regarding the lp:trademark_name field 
>> appeared.
>
> My understanding of this field is that it does not contain data that 
> is used to validate the applicant's eligibility.
>
> When a trademark clearinghouse is validating an application (for 
> example.foo, say), they will take the trademark number (provided in 
> the <lp:trademark_number> element) and use this to obtain the full 
> trademark information from the trademark authority that has 
> jurisdiction over the locality specified in the 
> <lp:trademark_locality> element. This information will include the 
> trademark name. The clearinghouse will then apply whatever the TLD's 
> policy is for confirming that the trademark matches the domain name 
> being applied for.
>
> The <lp:trademark_name> field is therefore only a hint used to confirm 
> the mark to which the application refers, but doesn't uniquely and 
> solely identify it. It may not even be needed.
>
> Does anyone agree/disagree?
>
> G.
>


-- 
Jens Wagner
Chief Executive Officer
HEXONET GmbH
Be Your Own Internet Services Provider

T: +49 6841 69 84 0
F: +49 6841 69 84 199
E: [email protected]
W: http://www.hexonet.net

HEXONET GmbH, Talstrasse 27, 66424 Homburg, Germany.  CEO & General Manager: Jens Wagner, HRB 2839 (HOM), Amtsgericht Saarbrücken, VAT-ID: DE-138316882
HEXONET Services Inc., 1100 - 1200 West 73rd Avenue, Vancouver, B.C., V6P 6G5, Canada.  CSO & General Manager: Robert Birkner

This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended only or the person(s) directly addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, transmission, distribution, or other forms of dissemination is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete this email with any files that may be attached.

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.