Re: LP naming convention
James Gould <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C9CDB9FA.3EEC4%[email protected]> |
Will, Thanks for bringing this up. I prefer the lowercase pvrc that is in line with the other EPP specifications (e.g. roid). -- JG James Gould Principal Software Engineer [email protected] 703-948-3271 21345 Ridgetop Circle LS2-2-1 Dulles, VA 20166 VerisignInc.com From: Wil Tan <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:11:47 -0400 To: <[email protected]> Subject: [provreg] LP naming convention Dear all, James Gould had voiced out a valid point, i.e. the elements are named in a lowercase-with-underscores rather than camelCase. The latter is more consistent with the rest of EPP, so I propose updating it to the following on the next iteration of the draft: application_id => applicationID trademark_name => trademarkName trademark_number => trademarkNumber trademark_locality => trademarkLocality trademark_entitlement => trademarkEntitlement pvrc => PVRC (or stay all lowercase, I'm ambivalent) Any comments or objections? .wil _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
image.gif
(image/gif, 1.7 KB) - not displayed