Re: EPP LaunchPhase Extension: draft requirements and scope
Jothan Frakes <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Actually, documentary support in the form of multiple trademarks on a given string would prove deeply helpful to some of the providers, as the weight (ie # of trademarks) may be a tiebreaker in the presence of dueling applicants on a string. We might see some providers operate in that manner. May as well leave it if it hurts nothing. Sent from my jphone On May 22, 2011 12:10 PM, "Gavin Brown" <[email protected]> wrote: With my serious hat on, I don't see what benefit there would be in allowing multiple claims for an application. If an applicant has multiple claims over a domain name, then surely they should just use the "strongest" one? G. -- Gavin Brown Chief Technology Officer CentralNic Global Registry Services Innovative Registry Services for ccTLD and gTLD registries https://www.centralnic.com/grs CentralNic Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 4985780. Registered... On 22 May 2011, at 18:13, Gavin Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On 21/05/2011 12:12, Wi... _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg