Re: Lists and EPP
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0703B8B1D7@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Patrik Fältström > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 7:33 AM > To: Jim Reid > Cc: Ulrich Wisser; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [provreg] Lists and EPP [snip] > People have, we see now, used the "e" part of epp a bit too much. > > And I dare to say that as I as Area Director when epp was invented > could have pushed back more, but I did not. So I blame myself. Don't, Patrik. The hard part about what we were doing is that we were trying to produce a protocol to automate a multitude of existing disparate registration processes and policies. That's not a good starting point for being able to reach agreement on one way and one way only. Given the operating environment I don't think we could have ever produced anything at all without extensibility. I still have "that's policy!" nightmares... :) Scott _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg