Re: Lists and EPP

Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:00:25PM +0200, Klaus Malorny wrote:

> However, generally, a reporting mechanism could be done in an
> incremental way, so that it even could be implemented in EPP:

Why do you want to Extend the protocol so that it's no longer even
about Provisioning?

I can see a possibly useful extension that requests a report be
generated.  That is, like other things in EPP, one can request that
something be provisioned (in this case, a report).  But the response
to that should not be a long list of domains in-protocol, I think.
EPP is poorly structured for that sort of bulk operation, on purpose.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.