Re: Lists and EPP
"Jan Jansen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, At the risk of opening a bad can of worms ... An alternative to the 'long' list could be to add a reference to the 'next' object similar to the 'DNSSEC zone walk' way. It preserves the EPP object style and allows to generate a list on the receivers side. On the bad side, it does not provide a unique view as things might change while retrieving the list although I guess that as a registrar you wouldn't care to much if you can do this on a regular base, say once a day or so. It might produce some heavy load on registry systems though. (But then again, we had to think more like registrars and less like registries ?) Fitting a round peg in hexagonal shape hole ? -jan- > On 9 jun 2011, at 05.14, [email protected] wrote: > >> Registrars which implemented agile clients had foresight. > > It is not that simple... > > A registrar have one user interface, regardless of whether it is a web > page or API. That exposes a certain business logic to the registrants. > > The registry then translates the business logic regarding registration, > renewal, transfer etc into the specific logic that the registry in > question require. > > This implies both changes in the business logic and epp requirements. > > And in many cases it does not matter how agile clients you have...because > the way renewal works for example, and requirements from the registry that > certain things must be exposed to the registrant and what not. > > Patrik > > _______________________________________________ > provreg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg > _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg