Re: Lists and EPP

"Jan Jansen" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all,

At the risk of opening a bad can of worms ... An alternative to
the 'long' list could be to add a reference to the 'next' object
similar to the 'DNSSEC zone walk' way. It preserves the EPP object
style and allows to generate a list on the receivers side.
On the bad side, it does not provide a unique view as things might
change while retrieving the list although I guess that as a registrar
you wouldn't care to much if you can do this on a regular base, say
once a day or so.

It might produce some heavy load on registry systems though.
(But then again, we had to think more like registrars and less
like registries ?)

Fitting a round peg in hexagonal shape hole ?

-jan-



> On 9 jun 2011, at 05.14, [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Registrars which implemented agile clients had foresight.
>
> It is not that simple...
>
> A registrar have one user interface, regardless of whether it is a web
> page or API. That exposes a certain business logic to the registrants.
>
> The registry then translates the business logic regarding registration,
> renewal, transfer etc into the specific logic that the registry in
> question require.
>
> This implies both changes in the business logic and epp requirements.
>
> And in many cases it does not matter how agile clients you have...because
> the way renewal works for example, and requirements from the registry that
> certain things must be exposed to the registrant and what not.
>
>    Patrik
>
> _______________________________________________
> provreg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
>

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.