Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Jim Reid <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17 Jun 2011, at 10:44, Patrik Fältström wrote: > I do understand if there are say 2-5 different business models etc, > but one per registry, that is (to be honest, but sorry for the > language -- I am exaggerating a bit of course) "just silly". I do > not see that being needed or good for domain name registrations in > the world. True. However with 200+ countries in the world, that pretty much means 200+ different business models because there are 200+ different registry policies or national laws.... :-( It might be better to approach this from a different direction. How about defining a standard set of registry transactions -- create/ delete/modify objects, renew and transfer a domain name, etc -- and writing this up as a BCP? Once that's done, the BCP could be encoded in a standard test suite. In other words, document what it is that's to be tested before developing a test suite. Some tests might be optional (for instance IDN and DNSSEC might not be deployed in places) while others are mandatory. _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg