Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
"Patrik Faltstrom (pfaltstr)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2 jul 2011, at 18:46, "Patrick Mevzek" <[email protected]> wrote: > So, Patrick, I agree with you, registries should "try to" see what exists > already before reinventing the wheel, but how to achieve that? I > honestly have no idea while still believing it is a worthwile goal. We can not police, but IETF can help by "stop being so nice" and ack that two registries that require ANY change in the registrar epp implementation are NOT interoperable. If just that is known, we are in a better situation. > Maybe registrars (as a group) + independant implementors should try to > raise their voice together... I think/hope that is what is now happening? ;-) Patrik - tired of all non-interoperable registry inventions in epp _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg