Re: draft-kong-epp-cdn-dnssec-mapping-00 Submitted for Review

"Gould, James" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <CACED2D4.1A5A8%[email protected]>
Peter,

Yes, you are correct that inheriting the DNSKEY of the OCDN across the
CDN's would work and the server would then generate the set of DS across
the OCDN and it's CDN's.  I guess the only question is whether you would
really want to share / inherit the key material, but that might make sense
for related domains like OCDN and CDN's.  I like the OCDN and CDN's to be
treated as separate entities, but if the CDN's are contained by the OCDN
and have to inherit the OCDN attributes, than use of the DNSKEY with the
Key Data Interface of RFC 5910 should meet the goal.

--


JG



James Gould
Principal Software Engineer
[email protected]

703-948-3271
21345 Ridgetop Circle
LS2-2-1
Dulles, VA 20166

VerisignInc.com




On 10/27/11 4:45 AM, "Peter Koch" <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 05:03:54PM +0800, Ning Kong wrote:
>
>> > Are you saying that the CDN's inherit all of the attributes of the
>>OCDN
>> > except for the DNSSEC attributes that can't?
>> Yes. Actually we hope all the CDNs could inherit all of the atrributes
>> of the OCDN. But because the DS must be bound with the name of CDN, so
>> the DNSSEC attributes of CDNs can't be same.
>
>so, why not operate on DNSKEY only - instead of DS?
>
>-Peter
>_______________________________________________
>provreg mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.