Re: Domain check in draft-obispo-epp-idn-00.txt
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5 jan 2012, at 23:28, Michael Young wrote: > A strategy of making client implementation easier is a good idea, but it > needs to extend to the registrant and storefront as well. For example > different terminology in different registries for a data element or > modifier/attribute is confusing for a domain user even if we find a way to > make epp client implementation cheaper (look at our discussions of language > versus script even). Michael, the "store front" registrars have MUST have the same taxonomy etc for all TLDs, so there is already a translation/adoption mechanism in the registrar system. I.e. differences in terminology and data elements between TLDs is already today not visible to the end users. If registries did harmonize more, it would make registrar work easier. And more registrars would become customers to more registries. And more harmonization would also because the translation engines in the registrars act more similar which implies the users would get more similar user interface when comparing registrars. Today, having similar user interfaces for for example .EU, .COM, .ORG and .SE is not easy. The TLDs are so completely different in the epp implementation that they are...hmm...different. Patrik _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg