Re: Domain check in draft-obispo-epp-idn-00.txt

:-) 

-M




On 12-01-06 2:21 AM, "Patrik Fältström" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>On 5 jan 2012, at 23:28, Michael Young wrote:
>
>> A strategy of making client implementation easier is a  good idea, but
>>it
>> needs to extend to the registrant and storefront as well. For example
>> different terminology in different registries for a data element or
>> modifier/attribute is confusing for a domain user even if we find a way
>>to
>> make epp client implementation cheaper (look at our discussions of
>>language
>> versus script even).
>
>Michael, the "store front" registrars have MUST have the same taxonomy
>etc for all TLDs, so there is already a translation/adoption mechanism in
>the registrar system. I.e. differences in terminology and data elements
>between TLDs is already today not visible to the end users.
>
>If registries did harmonize more, it would make registrar work easier.
>And more registrars would become customers to more registries. And more
>harmonization would also because the translation engines in the
>registrars act more similar which implies the users would get more
>similar user interface when comparing registrars.
>
>Today, having similar user interfaces for for example .EU, .COM, .ORG and
>.SE is not easy. The TLDs are so completely different in the epp
>implementation that they are...hmm...different.
>
>   Patrik
>


_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg