Re: Domain check in draft-obispo-epp-idn-00.txt

On Jan 6, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Keith Gaughan wrote:

> On 04/01/12 20:44, Francisco Obispo wrote:
> 
>> I agree that registrars should be performing those tests/validations ahead
>> of time and shouldn't rely exclusively on the registry for those types of
>> validation, because that would increase registry load significantly.
> 
> I very much doubt that it would increase registry load significantly, and I
> know because I've implemented code to do exactly that kind of validation, and
> the additional extra load was negligible in terms of overall request
> processing time. It wasn't even a blip compared to even the overhead of
> marshalling and unmarshalling EPP stanzas.
> 
> Both registrars and registries should be checking IDNs against codepoint
> whitelists.
> 

I agree, _both_ should be doing it,... my point above was about registrars exclusively performing validations using the <check> command.

At the end, I think this is implementation-specific, we might argue that it will or not, but it all comes down to the platform that is handling it.

Thanks 



> -- 
> Keith Gaughan, Senior Developer
> PGP/GPG key ID: 3E896381
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd. <http://blacknight.com/>
> 12A Barrowside Business Park, Carlow, Ireland
> Registered in Ireland, Company No.: 370845
> _______________________________________________
> provreg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg

Francisco Obispo 
email: [email protected]
Phone: +1 650 423 1374 || INOC-DBA *3557* NOC
Key fingerprint = 532F 84EB 06B4 3806 D5FA  09C6 463E 614E B38D B1BE





_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg