Re: Domain check in draft-obispo-epp-idn-00.txt
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Organization | Blacknight Internet Solutions |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06/01/12 17:22, Francisco Obispo wrote: > you would have to batch them by language, which could be cumbersome. This is what we already do for registry operators, such as Neustar, who already require language codes be provided when performing a <domain:check>. And yes, it is cumbersome, which is why I'm so dead-set against the extension requiring language tags be submitted when making <domain:check> request that contains one or more IDNs. > The alternative, would be to provide domain:check with A-labels We use A-labels internally for everything already. It's less prone to errors such as accidental encoding issues than using U-labels everywhere. The only times we deal with U-labels is when accepting requests from our store and validating IDNs. Unfortunately, that doesn't negate the need to send language codes to registrars. K. -- Keith Gaughan, Senior Developer PGP/GPG key ID: 3E896381 Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd. <http://blacknight.com/> 12A Barrowside Business Park, Carlow, Ireland Registered in Ireland, Company No.: 370845 _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg