Re: Changes we'd make to EPP, was Re: Domain check in draft-obispo-epp-idn-00.txt

On 07.01.12 10:49, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>
> On 6 jan 2012, at 19:58, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 06:17:20PM +0000, Keith Gaughan wrote:
>>> Another thing I'd change is provide a way for registries to signal to
>>> registrars that they've garbage collected contacts (and possibly hosts too).
>>
>> This, at least, ought to be possible using the poll queue.  I think
>> the poll queue as it stands is less than ideal, however.  I made a
>> suggestion about how to make the poll queue better for these purposes
>> in a long-expired draft (draft-sullivan-epp-experience-00), but they
>> weren't very popular.
>
> I rather see the registrar do "garbage_collect()" and the registry respond
> with a list of objects that was deleted. That would limit the amount
of time
> the view of the world on the registry and registrar side is different.
>

The answer could be really large and would probably take so much time 
that the registry would have to answer "pending". So you get the reply 
through the poll queue anyway. Besides that, it would make the registry 
dependent on the call from the registrars. What is the incentive for the 
registrar to clean the registry database?

/Ulrich





_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg