Re: Changes we'd make to EPP
Theo Kramer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17 Jan 2012, at 8:12 PM, Klaus Malorny wrote: > Hi all, > > interesting discussion so far, just want to throw in two points > > - depending on the data protection regulations of the country in which > the registry is located, unused personal data needs to be deleted > after some time. So registries may actually have no other choice > if they take data protection serious. > > - I just had an insane idea to avoid poll messages about the deletion of > contacts -- you may forget it just after you have finished > reading it (or even before): One could introduce an expiration date for > contacts. If a contact is created, it is set to one year in the future. > As long as the contact is used at least by one object, it is automatically > renewed, let's say a quarter before it expires. The registrar can either > track the expiration date (and perform a contact:info/check to check > its existence in case his recorded expiration date is in the past) > or simply create new contacts, as many registrars do it today. > For the registry, if the contact passes its expiration date, it is > simply deleted by the registry without any further fuss. > > There are also some design options to keep the effort in the registrar's > database low, e.g. synthesize the expiration date dynamically while the > contact is being used. +1 -- Regards Theo _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg