Re: Changes we'd make to EPP

MICHAEL YOUNG <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <CB3B5473.21998%[email protected]>
That leaves you with out of band, why is that better?

Michael Young




On 12-01-17 4:31 PM, "Andrew Sullivan" <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 04:21:08PM -0600, MICHAEL YOUNG wrote:
>> Yes we would, however the poll queue approach is a LOT of chatter even
>>if
>> you clean it out periodically like some registries do.
>
>Please read again the section of RFC 5730 I quoted.  There is no
>requirement that you put in a poll queue entry for each of these
>changes.  That's actually the point of that passage.
>
>Best,
>
>A
>-- 
>Andrew Sullivan
>[email protected]
>_______________________________________________
>provreg mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg


_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.