Re: Changes we'd make to EPP
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Organization | Blacknight Internet Solutions |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17/01/12 20:59, Gould, James wrote: > I believe this is getting a bit complex and convoluted. Contacts are > first class objects in themselves as defined by RFC 5733, so they could be > created at any point with no relation to a domain. Whether a registry supports it is entirely down to their policy, and they can declare that they support the extension in their greeting document. Whether an object is first class or not doesn't really effect whether it may expire. > I don't believe the > Registry should take any action to garbage collect them based on the lack > of references from other objects like domains. In systems like DotName a > contact can be linked to other types of objects (emailfwd, defreg, etc.), > so there is no hard dependency with being linked with a domain. Then in that case, the registry need not support the extension, in which case the objects will hang around in the registry's systems until they're explicitly deleted. K. -- Keith Gaughan, Senior Developer PGP/GPG key ID: 3E896381 Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd. <http://blacknight.com/> 12A Barrowside Business Park, Carlow, Ireland Registered in Ireland, Company No.: 370845 _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg