Re: Changes we'd make to EPP

On 17/01/12 22:21, MICHAEL YOUNG wrote:

>> You'd need an extension or a new contact mapping, though.
> 
> Yes we would, however the poll queue approach is a LOT of chatter even if
> you clean it out periodically like some registries do. Its clunky. More to
> the bigger question of doing work or not doing work, EPP has been rolling
> for 10 years, I think we could suffer a few well thought out improvements
> at this point.

When it happens is up to the registry: they can make it as chatty or not as
they like. These would, after all, be batch notifications: it doesn't make
much sense to send a separate notification for each and every separate
(pending) deletion.

Using the queue need not be chatty so long as registries choose when they
send them in a suitable manner.

K.

-- 
Keith Gaughan, Senior Developer
PGP/GPG key ID: 3E896381
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd. <http://blacknight.com/>
12A Barrowside Business Park, Carlow, Ireland
Registered in Ireland, Company No.: 370845
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg