Re: Standard Extensions

> Wil Tan's work covers at least the Registrar to Registry part of this
>well
> enough.

I believe Wil's work is a good starting point, but it is highly dependent
on the flow of sunrise and the rights periods.  All 3 interfaces are
dependent on each other based on the TMCH flow that has yet been fully
defined.  


> Might it be best to fold this into a revised version of RFC 3915?

I originally asked for this to be in RFC 3915 but there was objection to
it, so I had to create my own custom extension.  Combining these would be
a good item to discuss.



--
  
JG
 

 
James Gould
Principal Software Engineer
[email protected]
 
703-948-3271 (Office)
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
VerisignInc.com







On 1/18/12 11:47 AM, "Keith Gaughan" <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 18/01/12 14:19, Gould, James wrote:
>
>> I mirror Michael's interest list with some small additions:
>
><snip>
>
>> Launch Activities (EPP mappings / extensions)
>> 	1. Registrar to Trademark Clearinghouse
>> 	2. Registry to Trademark Clearinghouse
>> 	3. Registrar to Registry
>
>Wil Tan's work covers at least the Registrar to Registry part of this well
>enough.
>
>> 	2. RGP Poll Mapping
>
>Might it be best to fold this into a revised version of RFC 3915?
>
>> 	5. Low Balance Mapping
>
>This might be best generalised into an account information mapping. It'd
>be
>nice to be able to programmatically update various notification addresses
>and balance watermarks in addition to querying or being notified of the
>balance.
>
>K.
>
>-- 
>Keith Gaughan, Senior Developer
>PGP/GPG key ID: 3E896381
>Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd. <http://blacknight.com/>
>12A Barrowside Business Park, Carlow, Ireland
>Registered in Ireland, Company No.: 370845
>_______________________________________________
>provreg mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg