Re: Standard Extensions
Patrick Mevzek <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Organization | Dot And Co |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]> 2012-01-24 13:01 > How many registries are using custom result codes and status values? Indeed, I rewrote myself saying almost any registry, because I had in mind VeriSign which does not need custom codes. However as an EPP client implementor I've seen registries using their own result codes/status values in such ways: - either just adding items to the associated lists, breaking the EPP XML Schema validation (for the brave souls doing it live) - or adding "sub" values, that is besides standard ones - or creating a true EPP extension, in the RFC 3735 sense, with new values. Looking at my code I see at least the following: .FR .AT / IENUMAT .BE .EU .LU .NO .NL .CA but I'm not really keeping track of list of specific statuses, so there may be some more, maybe some registrars could provide more info. -- Patrick Mevzek _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg