Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Luis Muñoz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Feb 14, 2012, at 4:25 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > RFC 5891 section 4.1 suggests that it would be desirable to require > both the A-label and U-label as input, so that the registry side could > valdate whether the A-label actually corresponds to the desired > U-label. I know that some don't think this is a good policy to have, > but that's not relevant for this discussion; the question is, if > someone were going to implement such a policy, how could they? I agree that this might come in handy in many cases, and probably does not hurt. Best regards. -lem _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg