Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 15 feb 2012, at 04:19, Jay Daley wrote: > On 15/02/2012, at 4:09 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote: > >>> I agree that this might come in handy in many cases >> >> Mention one. > > In .nz we expect both the U and A labels and that the A label is correctly derived from the U. The reasoning for this is that registrants are not in their minds registering the A label, they are registering the U label and we want to guard against a processing error that would not provide what the registrant wants. With only an A label we can't trap this. And you have factual errors where a U-label and an A-label does not match? You do not talk about cases where they believe they can register some unicode string that is not a U-label? Note, the discussion is about U-labels and A-labels, not unicode strings and A-labels. Patrik _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg