Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Jay Daley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 15/02/2012, at 4:40 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote: > And you have factual errors where a U-label and an A-label does not match? In testing yes, not in production, but then we have less than 200 IDN registrations. > You do not talk about cases where they believe they can register some unicode string that is not a U-label? You only asked for one example, not a canonical ruleset for how we process the U-label data! Obviously the U-label must be valid and if it is not then we don't process it in the same way we don't process invalid A-labels. > Note, the discussion is about U-labels and A-labels, not unicode strings and A-labels. And my point was that for non-IDNs the registrant believes they are registering an A-label which is the same A-label that the registry registers. But with IDN there is no longer this direct relationship as the registrant believes they are registering the U-label while the registry actually registers the A-label. Jay -- Jay Daley Chief Executive .nz Registry Services (New Zealand Domain Name Registry Limited) desk: +64 4 931 6977 mobile: +64 21 678840 _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg