Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries

Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:52:15 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On 5 mar 2012, at 14:49, Gould, James wrote:

> I'm not voting but simply covering how the two interfaces made it into the RFC.  I can see the basis for both interfaces, but I certainty don't believe that a mix in a single registry is workable.  
> 

Similarly, I do not see a mix in a single registrar is workable.

   paf

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 195 B)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFPVMUPrMabGguI180RAiAdAJ0etq31LlhgJ9UktljUWBqIn+2c4QCbBWAv
jr9+ketWfD4rgTO7Yxjxgls=
=N14i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----