Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5 mar 2012, at 14:54, Peter Koch wrote: > The provisioning protocol should implement policy, not dictate it. > Otherwise you'd really end up with incompatible extensions. Absolutely! There is always a balance between freedom in protocol specifications and interoperability... Patrik _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) iD8DBQFPVMamrMabGguI180RAhzAAJ0ZVBImXlRpZ1JhHYF52nnq4d7c5ACdFYvN mYvV2ujR61s2nkedGz6XhZA= =dO7S -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----