Re: clTRID element clarification
Luis Muñoz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 7, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > "MAY be used to uniquely identify the command *to the client*" > > (emphasis mine), and > > "Clients are responsible for maintaining their own transaction identifier space to ensure uniqueness." > > This doesn't seem ambiguous to me. That language does not directly contradicts a server using it to provide a cached response to a command with the same (command, clTRID, arguments...) n-tuple, right? -lem _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg