Re: clTRID element clarification

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luis Muñoz [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:11 PM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: Aaron Roberts; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [provreg] clTRID element clarification
> 
> 
> On Mar 7, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> 
> > "MAY be used to uniquely identify the command *to the client*"
> >
> > (emphasis mine), and
> >
> > "Clients are responsible for maintaining their own transaction
> identifier space to ensure uniqueness."
> >
> > This doesn't seem ambiguous to me.
> 
> That language does not directly contradicts a server using it to
> provide a cached response to a command with the same (command, clTRID,
> arguments...) n-tuple, right?

No, it doesn't. It also doesn't include restrictions for any number of other behaviors. It describes who owns the item and what may do with it. One shouldn't assume that something is allowable unless it's expressly prohibited.

Scott
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg