Re: clTRID element clarification
Theo Kramer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07 Mar 2012, at 11:08 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > Given that RFC 5730 is part of Standard 69 there's not much chance of a near-term amendment, but our process allows us to collect errata. I'm not convinced that there's anything here to correct, though. Section 2.5 currently says this: > > "MAY be used to uniquely identify the command *to the client*" > Is that not perhaps something that slipped through the cracks? Ie. should it not read "MAY be used to uniquely identify the command from the client" ? -- Regards Theo _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg