Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Ulrich Wisser <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello everybody, sorry I am late for the party. :-) In my opinion we did quite well with 5910. We allowed both policies and made it possible for registrars to interact with hundreds of registries with only two distinct interfaces. Maybe we could have done better on EPP implementation policies. Maybe Postel's Law, "be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others" could be applied here. If a registrar sends both DS and DNSKEY interface the registry should choose one and ignore the other. And not reject the command. Although I am not really convince that this would be a good thing. /Ulrich _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg