Re: IDN administrative bundling
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 30 mar 2012, at 04:05, Francisco Obispo wrote: > If you are just waiting for the registrar to send the same command over and over again until it completes the names in the bundle, why don't you process it upfront with the first one? The main difference between the two models is whether the registry should do changes that are to be reflected in the registrar database, or whether the registrar should do all commands. I am personally as a registrar in favor of the latter. That the registry should really minimize the number of changes made that have to be reflected in the registrar database. And because of that it is better if the status is "pending" until the registrar have made changes to all objects involved. Is there an alternative when some domain names in the bundle is not registered? Not delegated? Requirements on same delegation of all of them? I.e. I think we have a generic issue related to bundles to discuss. Similar problems happens when both the holder and the registrar changes for a domain name in the bundle btw. How do you handle the contact object when changes happens to the domain object? But, just like Francisco I also ask what mechanism is to be used to ensure the registrant and registrar (and everyone else) know what domain names are in the bundle? Orthogonal question, but also important. Patrik _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg