Re: IDN administrative bundling

Wil Tan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <CACnMJCPbf55AM_eZ7OsKYJ74F=jCnaD0-Xn69vg4SDz=zvmsKg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Tes <[email protected]> wrote:

> In this draft,it let the registrant to create 'bundle' members in epp
>

and

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Francisco Obispo <[email protected]> wrote:

> you could treat them as a bundle, so if you get a transfer or registrant
> update request, you will always apply the change to the whole set…
>

According to Ben, keeping the domains "independent from a registration and
DNS management perspective" is an explicit requirement. In that case,
bundling (in the RFC4290 / RFC3743 sense) wouldn't help. If it was just a
sunrise/grandfathering process as with AFNIC's upcoming launch of French
IDNs, you could accept domain creation requests during the process window
and handle it in batch mode. Then again, AFNIC's implementation does not
seem to require the same registrant or registrar of record once the domains
are created.


In any case, it seems like if you don't do the bundle treatment, you will
> have to code your own extension to manage it.


Yes, an extension to force the registrar to realise that there are other
domains in the administrative bundle, and send those along in create,
update and transfer requests. Once the registry verifies that the bundle
members are correct, it can effect the change on all of them.

.wil

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.