Re: ICANN TMCH draft specifications available - E PP extensions?
Luis Muñoz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alexander Mayrhofer <[email protected]> wrote: >Therefore, if no work has yet been performed on the specification of >those extensions in an internet draft, i think it makes sense to bundle >forces among new gTLD backend operators in order to create such an >extension. (Apart from that, i would also appreciate informal tech >contacts to other emerging new gTLD backend operators, in order to >discuss other operational / technical issues around the EPP >implementation). The extensions and the overall process need to be discussed and worked on. It would be interesting to add test sites to that work. Perhaps that could be shared? Count me in... -lem _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg