Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Miek Gieben <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[ Quoting <[email protected]> in "Re: [provreg] [Regops] draft-wulli..." ] > > So your proposal is to make it stateful based on the HTTP session? This > > Yes, you can keep HTTP-session information in a shared way across multiple > servers (memcached, SQL-db, etc). so you can have any front-end server > vailidate it. > > Clients can keep the connection (or session) alive by issuing commands > periodically. Interesting twist :) Reading the other comments, I get the feeling that: Yes, EPP over REST is an interesting idea, but we overcame all (alleged) shortcomings of EPP by implementing sophisticated load balancing techniques. To us EPP over REST is a simplification over EPP and makes stuff possible without resorting to load balancers. Also EPP over REST is relatively easy to implement as HTTP/REST module exist for numerous languages. Kind regards, Miek Gieben _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+VpOsACgkQJYuFzziA0PaO9gCgogcJ7PXauVpAOnyajuvxEImQ AiAAoKi7rmCPLXGfRRMrHJVqIJ3Sfcph =GNJv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----