Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted
"Gould, James" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CC4AAEA0.6892C%[email protected]> |
Keith, This is following what has been done with the EPP RFC's. Is there anything that you notice different with the XML samples included in the Launch Phase EPP Extension than with the EPP RFC's? -- JG James Gould Principal Software Engineer [email protected] 703-948-3271 (Office) 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com On 8/10/12 12:13 PM, "Keith Gaughan" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 02:23:17PM +0000, Gould, James wrote: > >> I've been working with Wil Tan and Gavin Brown on updating the Launch >>Phase EPP >> Extension Mapping to support the two models (ICANN and ARI/Neustar) >>along with >> the models that were previously defined in the Launch Phase EPP >>Extension >> Version 01. You can find the draft at the URL http://www.ietf.org/id/ >> draft-tan-epp-launchphase-02.txt. This is a straw man draft to kick >>off the >> discussions as the tmch-tech list works out the model. I've already >>posted a >> message on the tmch-tech list to start the discussions there. > >Small nit: quite a number of the stanzas have namespace declarations for >http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance, but with no schema locations >specified on the relevant elements or any other attributes from that >namespace >being used. Is there any reason why XSI is being used in the example >stanzas? >Just curious. > >-- >Keith Gaughan, Development Lead >PGP/GPG key ID: 82AC3634 >Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd. <http://blacknight.com/> >12A Barrowside Business Park, Carlow, Ireland >Registered in Ireland, Company No.: 370845 >_______________________________________________ >provreg mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg