Re: Standard Extensions
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D664DB1@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> |
It's been a long time since I started this thread back in January. Someone recently asked me a question about an EPP extension, so I thought it wise to see if I could revisit the discussion and post a summary. Here's the original question: > Let's assume for a moment that we have enough interest to form a > working group focused on the development of a set of standard EPP > extensions. If we had to start writing a charter today, what > functionality would people most like to see included? and here's a summary of the suggestions (my apologies if I missed any), including new efforts that have recently surfaced: 1. A garbage collection mechanism. 2. Extension for registrars to get registry/zone policy information. 3. Extension to provide account status information to registrars. 4. An IDN extension*. 5. A TLD launch extension*. 6. A trademark management extension*. 7. Standardized registry-to-registrar notifications. 8. An extension for VAT and/or tax ID information. 9. An extension for a legal/personal attribute on contact objects. 10. An extension for additional status value and/or result codes, perhaps with an associated IANA registry. 11. An extension for cryptographic signatures. 12. An extension for delegation errors/warnings. Those that are described in a draft I've seen are marked with an asterisk. IMHO twelve is probably too many to bootstrap a new working group. If we could whittle this down to 6 or 7 AND we have actual drafts written for consideration it may be possible for us to get something going. Which of the above topics has been addressed in a draft? Who is willing to write drafts for those topics that haven't yet been addressed? Scott _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg