Re: Standard Extensions

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 22-08-12 13:58, Patrik Fältström wrote:

> If your question is "what where you forced to implement differently
> with different registries" the answer is so far for me:
> 
> - DNSSEC, clarification if DS or DNSKEY is to be passed to
> registry

Apart from the DS/DNSKEY question for the delegation, there is also a
request to have an EPP extension for registrars to send ZSK
information (a KEY) to be relayed by the registry in case of a
dns-operator change
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-koch-dnsop-dnssec-operator-change-04).

As this is a rather new topic, after some registries made their
initial decision to use DS in stead of DNSKEY, I think this might
influence consensus on using DNSKEY. We actually need the "key to be
relayed" as an EPP extension to facilitate automated DNSSEC secure
transfers, and will implement it regardless of standardisation.

But if it needs a request: We would like the "key to be relayed" as a
standard EPP extension. It contains a KEY.

- -- 
Antoin Verschuren

Technical Policy Advisor SIDN
Meander 501, PO Box 5022, 6802 EA Arnhem, The Netherlands

P: +31 26 3525500  F: +31 26 3525505  M: +31 6 23368970
mailto:[email protected]  xmpp:[email protected]
http://www.sidn.nl/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQNM2eAAoJEDqHrM883AgnYDAH/0Q/DtSrt4PPxxHGYM1CwwG9
9w79Vqp0t1K7H5bPaUUBF9uggzwxD341FPjqbRz2EJM9Djwj9L0WjqLZ7WmACH7U
Lo4W7S1NvLlX3Vcw7VvCsfoqaPqOfV7nD0UlxqArMsN3aLR/m1EUJXnhqvMEZV96
r+VhxYSNjkLIoYRbyjXmzKPsTd2SmfzeUfqE5HheKk93OA7N+2m/ERNnzyCj2zHo
RKS+arKJs+lRyNoNTdfgYKmvaconvFRhfREtWEXrlJJ8Kb2Srz4oP6MnqKNWQ41M
Ifc2XTE24evxUSP4D+vxCVTFkYXcHjZUuoJocvI1BggQwwqS8S+dqNTgcar+Eds=
=Jp+n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg