Re: Standard Extensions
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D66574D@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 8:00 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott > Cc: Günther Mair; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [provreg] Standard Extensions [snip] > If the differences in epp also imposed an extra cost on the registries, > so that there was an economical penalty on a registry to implement > something "different from other registries", then I think we might have > seen a different evolution of epp. Probably true (casting glances in the direction of ICANN, at least from the gTLD perspective), but I guess part of the reason I asked the question is because one such penalty could be a lack of support from registrars - who are unfortunately caught in the middle. Scott _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg