Re: Standard Extensions

I am having trouble identifying the problem that this extension aims to
solve. Is the use case for this consider transport mechanisms other than
TCP with TLS (and client authentication)? Perhaps someone can enlighten me?

On 24/08/12 12:50 AM, "Gavin Brown" <[email protected]> wrote:

>> 11. An extension for cryptographic signatures.
>
>I did a draft for this and mentioned it on this list, it's not been
>published as an I-D:
>
>https://raw.github.com/jodrell/draft-brown-eppSig/master/draft-brown-eppsi
>g.txt
>
>G.
>
>-- 
>Gavin Brown
>Chief Technology Officer
>CentralNic Ltd
>Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry Services
>for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries
>https://www.centralnic.com/
>
>CentralNic Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company
>number 4985780. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6AR.
>_______________________________________________
>provreg mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg