Re: Has the EPP world really changed?
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 24 aug 2012, at 10:59, "Ucom.ch - Bernie Hoeneisen" <[email protected]> wrote: > Some typical answers were: > > * Registries: > > "Why should we go through the effort of standardizing and > implementing standard EPP Extensions, if we can just define > our own stuff and our Registars have to implement it anyways?" > > * (Big) Registrars: > > "Our system anyways talks to most of the Registries. So, why > should we put effort in standardization, which only helps our > competitors to build much simpler EPP Client systems?" > > > Has the world really changed or are we about to run into the same barriers that have prevented EPP Extensions from being standardized in the past decade? This is a generic IETF discussion. "Why should we create standards that lead to interoperable implementations?". Same answers. In some cases it works, in some it does not. Patrik _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg