Re: Has the EPP world really changed?
Edward Lewis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <a06240802cc5d4a2850fe@[10.33.203.101]> |
At 16:50 +0200 8/24/12, Patrik Fältström wrote: >As a long term participant in the IETF community, I am VERY concerned!!! Why I am not so concerned is...the population that uses EPP is, compared to the general case, rather constrained. As opposed to more general purpose applications like SMTP, SIP and XMPP (just to parrot the list you mentioned), EPP is a business-to-business protocol in a single industry. All sorts of individuals (in terms of mission) send mail, call, and message. But only domain name registries and registrars use EPP. (And not even all of "them" do.) I too have seen instances were too many options is a deterrent to deployment. In places were there are many operational choices dictating many configuration knobs, things get complicated. I don't think we have that with EPP. Even if we add 2000 TLDs, it's still just about domain names with basic contact information. Policies for modes of operation will vary but they may converge on their own. (The 2000 new TLDs will share more in common that the current 300 if just because they contracting agent is the same.) -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NeuStar You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468 2012...time to reuse those 1984 calendars! _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg