Re: Extension for an abuse contact in Domain objects?
Luis Muñoz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Oct 29, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
>> From a technical ("EPP protocol") perspective, a new contact type
> wouldn't be any different from the existing types. To make it useful
> (e.g. - guaranteeing that the anti-abuse contact is somehow better
> than the present technical contact) would require having a further set
> of policy to enforce usefulness.
Yes, ideally there would be a policy layer further clarifying this. Is there merit in building this policy along with the extension?
Best regards
-lem
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg