Re: ROID how useful?
Francisco Obispo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm wondering whether it is there by an omission because of how the draft evolved into the RFC or a conscious decision by the authors. If it is a conscious decision and everyone expects to use the roid and not the contact:id to perform transfers and privileged <info>'s, then I'm OK with it. We also implemented as the RFC, but it feels 'wrong'. Francisco On Dec 11, 2012, at 6:48 PM, "Gould, James" <[email protected]> wrote: > Francisco, > > My feedback is below. > > Are you proposing to change an RFC for this or just asking whether registries have implemented it? We have implemented per the RFC. I don't have any stats to share related to how often the roid has been referenced in the domain info or transfer commands. > > JG > > James F. Gould > Principal Engineer > Verisign Francisco Obispo Director of Applications and Services - ISC email: [email protected] Phone: +1 650 423 1374 || INOC-DBA *3557* NOC PGP KeyID = B38DB1BE _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg