Re: ROID how useful?

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D6BB8C9@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Francisco Obispo
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 9:53 PM
> To: Gould, James
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [provreg] ROID how useful?
> 
> I'm wondering whether it is there by an omission because of how the
> draft evolved into the RFC or a conscious decision by the authors.
> 
> If it is a conscious decision and everyone expects to use the roid and
> not the contact:id to perform transfers and privileged <info>'s, then
> I'm OK with it.

The ROID concept wasn't part of the original EPP drafts that I wrote. It was added later at the suggestion of Patrik Fältström. The decision to use the ROID in the way documented in RFC 5731 was made consciously.

Scott
_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.