Re: Followup: Restrictions on EPP host renames?
Michael Young <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
See below On 2012-12-19, at 15:00, Seth Goldman <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, so it's clear to me that host object renames should be supported by our implementation. So I had some follow-up questions on the topic: > > Can you rename a subordinate host object to be under a different domain? (e.g. ns1.example.com to ns1.otherdomain.com) Hmmmm never considered that one what use case do you think would incite that action? > Can you rename an external host object to be subordinate? (e.g. ns1.example.org to ns1.example.com) You could i guess but what's the gain when mass updates don't apply to external hosts? So I wouldn't > Can you rename a subordinate host object to be external? (e.g. ns1.example.com to ns1.example.org) > No how would you handle existing glue records that are now not allowed? > The RFC doesn't seem to say anything on these questions. Is this just a server defined policy? Or should are all of the above be allowed? Some of this falls out to other DNS specific rfcs > _______________________________________________ > provreg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg