Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay-00.txt

Klaus Malorny <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 24/01/13 09:21, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This draft may be of interest to this list.
> At SIDN, we have documented how we intend to implement secure
> transfers of DNSSEC domains and this draft is to describe the EPP
> command we're going to use for that so it may be standardized.
> Comments are welcome to the authors or on this list.
>

Hi,

interesting draft. On the first glance, I'd like to note the following:

1. why is the use of the authinfo only optional? Isn't it better
    to make it mandatory and reject the submission if the authinfo
    is incorrect? In this case, the poll message does not need to
    contain the authinfo.

2. The current registrar does not know from which registrar the
    key data is coming. In case of problems, he is unable to contact
    the respective registrar. Also, he is unable to determine whether
    the keys come from different sources and need either to be
    combined or replaced.

3. How long shall the current registrar/name server operator add the
    DNSKEYs to the respective zone? If, for example, the registrant
    changes his mind and does no longer want the new registrar to
    transfer the domain to him, or wants to choose a different
    registrar, there is no way to indicate this. Alternatively,
    this could be solved by some kind of automatic timeout, i.e.
    if the the <keyrelay> operation is not repeated periodically,
    the current registrar shall remove the keys from the zone.
    If this period is not part of the registry policy, maybe
    the <keyrelay> command should contain a point in time until
    which the keys shall be added. If the (potentially) gaining
    registrar determines to need more time for whatever reason,
    he can submit another <keyrelay> command with the same keys,
    but a later date. Of course, the current registrar (or registry?)
    should check the time for reasonable limits.

Regards,

Klaus

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.