Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay-00.txt

[ Quoting <[email protected]> in "Re: [provreg] Fwd: New Version Noti..." ]
> Op 25-01-13 11:40, Klaus Malorny schreef:
> 
> > BTW, I am still a bit puzzled that you and/or registrars see no use
> > for that. With a registrar hat on, I wouldn't want to accept
> > arbitrary DNSKEY records from third parties and keep them for
> > unlimited time in the zone. But maybe I am in a negligible minority
> > ;-)

<SNIP>

> When the losing operator overrides the advised timers anyway, I just
> don't see the need to relay an advised timer over the protocol when it
> is consequently ignored.

If everybody cooperates such a timer can be used for something good. I.e.
dropping the key when the timer expires. 

I think it is a small and worthwhile addition.

grtz Miek

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlECe8EACgkQJYuFzziA0PYqGgCggSTuNmIsc8ttMsE5oMSK1o6r
9AoAoMOjDs+MvmFIj1S4prCszw8NTYf5
=Ws63
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----