Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 06
Michael Young <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I want to second Rubens suggestion to avoid competing drafts - we have enough largely unnecessary divergence in overlapping extensions with existing TLDs. This is an opportunity to avoid further disparity. Michael Young M:647-289-1220 On 2013-02-26, at 9:38, Rubens Kuhl <[email protected]> wrote: > > James, > > The main advantage I see in ARI's competing draft for this task is the suitability to registries that operates asynchronously during its normal operations. This happens with a lot of ccTLDs, and most community or restricted new gTLDs could also benefit. > Do you see a way to incorporate such mechanisms into your draft ? In this way we could have a general mechanism for domain registrations that cannot be completed based just of name availability: auctions, no-money bids (like who proposes the best use of a generic name on a TLD), registration restrictions that cannot be checked online (membership, taxpayer status) etc. > > It could even have a new name like draft-tan-epp-asynchronous, but the two drafts model Chris Wright suggest could work better. > > > Rubens > > > > > Em 26/02/2013, às 11:30:000, Gould, James escreveu: > >> Wil Tan, Gavin Brown and I have updated the Launch Phase EPP Extension Mapping to Version 06. The IETF Internet-Draft Submission page is suspended until 2013-03-11, so the draft is attached in TXT and HTML format. We will post the draft once the IETF Internet-Draft Submission page opens. This version includes the following changes: >> >> Removed the definition of the mark-1.0 and signedMark-1.0 and replaced with reference to draft-lozano-smd, that contains the definition for the mark, signed marked, and encoded signed mark. >> Split the <launch:timestamp> into <launch:generatedDate> and <launch:acceptedDate> based on feedback from Trung Tran. >> Added the "includeMark" optional attribute to the <launch:info> element to enable the client to request whether or not to include the mark in the info response. >> Fixed state diagram to remove redundant transition from "invalid" to "rejected"; thanks Klaus Malorny. >> Please reply with any feedback. >> >> Thanks, >> >> JG >> >> James Gould >> Verisign >> <draft-tan-epp-launchphase.txt><draft-tan-epp-launchphase.html>_______________________________________________ >> provreg mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg > > _______________________________________________ > provreg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg _______________________________________________ provreg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg